Castlevania: Belmont's Curse Reviews: Metacritic Score and Steam Reception

The aggregate scores, a sample of individual critic scores, the points critics agree and disagree on, and the mixed Steam launch — all timestamped.

By Game Guide PortSource reviewed:

Applies to: Critic aggregates and Steam user reception for Castlevania: Belmont's Curse as of October 15–16, 2026, with every figure kept to its own source and timestamp

Quick answer

Critics are positive and players are split. On October 15, 2026 Metacritic sat at 86 from roughly 51 critic reviews on PS5, and OpenCritic at 85 with 97% of critics recommending — the series' best new-game reception in about two decades. On Steam the same week the user rating was Mixed, mostly because of PC launch problems rather than the game itself: at the time of this check the store showed about 2,357 reviews with roughly 1,566 positive. Every number here moves, so treat them as snapshots.

Official screenshot of a golden, sunlit area with statues and ornate architecture
Official Castlevania: Belmont's Curse screenshot · © Konami Digital Entertainment · Source ↗

At a glance

Belmont's Curse reviewed well and launched rough on PC. Those are two different measurements of two different things, and both are true at once.

Reception snapshot — every figure is tied to its own date
MeasureValueAs of
Metacritic (PS5)86, from about 51 critic reviewsOctober 15, 2026
OpenCritic85, 97% of critics recommendingOctober 15, 2026
Steam user ratingMixed — about 2,357 reviews, roughly 1,566 positiveOctober 16, 2026
These numbers are snapshots and they move. Aggregate scores change as more reviews are added, and the Steam total changes by the hour in the first week. Read them as "what the picture looked like on the dates above", not as fixed scores.

The critic scores

On the PS5 critic listings, most reviews landed in the 80–100 range with a small tail of 70s. A sample of the individual scores, taken from aggregator listings rather than re-scored here:

Selected critic scores as listed by aggregators (not averaged here)
OutletScore
GameSpot10 / 10
Game Informer9.25 / 10
IGN8 / 10
GamesRadar+8 / 10
TheSixthAxis8 / 10
Push Square7 / 10
Siliconera7 / 10

What critics praise

  • The combat and the whip. The whip's dual role as weapon and movement tool is the most consistently praised part of the game.
  • Traversal and animation. Reviewers describe the movement as fluid and acrobatic, and built around speed.
  • Presentation. The painterly gothic art direction and the environments draw wide approval.
  • Rose Belmont. The new protagonist is repeatedly singled out as a strong lead.

What critics criticise

  • It plays it safe. Several reviewers argue it is a confident homage rather than an evolution, and some wanted it to take more risks.
  • Exploration feels secondary. More than one critic says the action platforming outclasses the Metroidvania side, with backtracking and fast travel that arrive late.
  • Visual readability. Heavy use of red in some areas is reported to make enemies and detail harder to separate from the background.
  • The soundtrack divides people. It is one reviewer's weakest element and another's highlight — a genuine disagreement rather than a consensus.

The Steam divide

The Mixed Steam rating is driven mainly by launch-day PC problems rather than by the game's design: black screens, menu and map scroll bugs, stutter, and Steam Deck performance. Positive reviews frequently come from players who had to change a setting first. The practical implication is simple: if you are buying on PC, look at the troubleshooting page before you judge, because the "can't launch at all" complaints usually have a specific cause.

What is not settled

  • The final aggregate scores. They will settle over weeks, not days.
  • Whether the Steam rating recovers. It depends on patches, and no patch schedule is published.

Sources and review scope

Aggregate scores come from Metacritic and OpenCritic; the Steam figures come from Steam's own review summary. Individual outlet scores are quoted from aggregator listings rather than from averaging them, and they are attributed rather than endorsed. The praise and criticism points are themes the reviews share, not this site's own review — this page is a source review, not a play-test. Checked on October 16, 2026.

How this guide was checked

Checked on October 16, 2026 against KONAMI's official game site (product, character, demo and known-issues pages), the Steam store listing and the public Steam Web API endpoints for this app, and the PlayStation Store and Nintendo listings. KONAMI's own statements and store data are kept separate from third-party guides, which are labelled where they are used. Live figures such as review totals and aggregate scores are timestamped snapshots that keep moving. Anything no source states is written as unconfirmed rather than guessed.

Not independently play-tested. This is not a claim that every platform or game version was tested. Source review: Oct 16, 2026.